|Region:||Iceland and Arctic Ocean|
|Measurement method(s):||InSAR, GPS - continuous|
|Duration of observation:||Continuous|
|Inferred cause of deformation:||Magmatic, Faulting/tectonics|
|Characteristics of deformation:|
Summary based on Clifton et al. (2002):
The Hengill, Hrómundartindur and Grensdalur volcanic systems are located at the Hengill triple junction at which the oblique Reykjanes Peninsula (rift) zone. A period of markedly enhanced seismicity began in the area in July 1994 and continued through 1998, with more than 80 000 small earthquakes occurring. Seismicity increased in 1995, decreased in 1996 and then increased significantly in 1997 and 1998.
“The 1994–1998 seismic period was associated with widespread crustal uplift. Sparse leveling data covering the period from 1986 to 1995 and GPS data from 1991 to 1994 show surface deformation consistent with a Mogi point source of pressure at about 6.5 km depth, interpreted to reflect magma accumulation centered under the Hrómundartindur volcanic system (Sigmundsson et al., 1997). A continuous GPS network established in the area between March and May, 1999 has detected no significant uplift (0±5 mm/yr), and only 2 mm eastward motion in the 12 months since measurements began (Árnadóttir et al., 2000)”.
Feigl et al. (2000) used InSAR over the period 1993 to 1998 and showed that the deformation signal was a concentric pattern of fringes with a relatively constant 19±2 mm/yr rate of uplift around a point source of magma accumulation on the northwestern edge of the Grensdalur volcanic system, at about 7 km depth. The authors show that the location of the uplift center had been stable for the 5-yr period.
The Icelandic Meteorological Office (IMO) leads long-term monitoring of geohazards in Iceland and is responsible for maintaining instrument networks for this purpose. FutureVolc detail a description of in-situ monitoring networks in Iceland and available results. In-situ instrumentation to monitor geological hazards in Iceland includes seismic, GPS, strain, hydrological, radar, infrasound networks, and scanning DOAS spectrometers. With InSAR, the volcanoes in Iceland are not covered by a single systematic study but 85% of them have been included in separate studies of volcanic, seismic, cryospheric or geothermal processes (Biggs et al., 2014).
|Reference:||Smithsonian Institution Global Volcanism Program |
|Reference:||Clifton, A., F. Sigmundsson, K. Feigl, G. Gunnarsson, Th. Árnadóttir, Surface effects of faulting and deformation resulting from magma accumulation at the Hengill triple junction, SW Iceland, 1994-1998, J. Volc. Geotherm. Res., 115, 233-255, 2002.|
|Reference:||Sturkell, E., Einarsson, P., Sigmundsson, F., Geirsson, H., Olafsson, H., Pedersen, R., ... & Stefánsson, R. (2006). Volcano geodesy and magma dynamics in Iceland. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 150(1), 14-34.|
|Reference:||The Icelandic Meteorological Office (IMO)|
View of Hromundartindur volcano. Source: Smithsonian Institution Global Volcanism Program
Sourced from FutureVolc (http://futurevolc.hi.is/volcanoes-and-monitoring): “Iceland: volcanoes and present long-term monitoring stations. The volcanic areas consist of volcanic systems, made of central volcanoes, calderas and fissure swarms. Western Eastern, and Northern volcanic zones marked (WVZ, EVZ, NVZ) are located on the divergent plate boundary between the North-American and Eurasian plates. Iceland’s most active volcanoes are Grímsvötn (G) and Bárðarbunga (B) under the Vatnajökull ice cap, Katla (K) under Mýrdalsjökull ice cap, and Hekla (H). Eyjafjallajökull vocano is labelled E”.